WCF Binding Comparison

I have been through different articles to find a comparison table about WCF Bindings. I just came across this comparison table by Aaron Skonnard.  I hope this would be a good reference comparison table.

Quoting to Aaron Skonnard’s  Blog in Plural Sight(original source), In my ongoing quest to produce the simplest table possible summarizing the key differences between the various Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) built-in bindings, I came up with the following:  

   Notes: X = Not Supported, WS-A = WS-Addressing, WS-AT = WS-AtomicTransaction, OleTx = OleTransactions
* Transaction flow is always disabled by default, but when you enable it, these are the default tx protocols
* This binding doesn’t use a WCF message encoding – instead it lets you choose a pre-WCF serialization format

Thanks to Original Source – Plural Insight

Taken from DotnetFunda.com

Note :- The below table is taken from book Pro WCF: Practical Microsoft SOA Implementation — Chris peiris and Denis mulder – Apress 2007

Below is a table which shows for which binding which mode is supported. We did not discuss the mixed mode. It’s nothing but combination of transport and mixed mode. For instance data encrypted and passed over WsHttp using HTTPS is a mixed mode of security. Encryption is nothing but message security and HTTPS is a transport mode. In a combination they form mixed mode.